RADE
发表于 2025-3-27 00:26:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2242/224174/224174_31.png
AMOR
发表于 2025-3-27 01:59:41
Methods,struct them according to our purposes. This makes philosophical analysis a normative endeavor. We also justify why philosophers are no moral experts but merely referees of moral discourse, which also suggest recalibrating AI ethics to make it more effective and inclusive.
Genome
发表于 2025-3-27 08:55:15
The Social Dimension,tial relationships. Through a pragmatic approach to assigning descriptors and thereby constituting them, we reject the idea of essentialist interpretations of social categories. The introduction of the concepts of domestication and digitization prove the points by showing that social categories have
贫困
发表于 2025-3-27 10:17:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2242/224174/224174_34.png
内部
发表于 2025-3-27 13:40:00
Artificial Social Agents,anthropomorphism, as the negatives outweigh the positives. We also reject the idea that we relate to machines via mental states of gendered appearance. We discuss the idea of understanding chatbots as instances of the objective spirit but reject this on conceptual grounds. Instead, we can understand
disrupt
发表于 2025-3-27 18:04:34
Social Reverberations,pens in four ways. First, we enter the debate on robot rights and test the pragmacentrist approach. We find that a relational approach of this kind, similar to Gunkel’s and Coeckelbergh’s positions, defuses many of the issues motivating the robot rights debate. Second, we assess whether human-center
垫子
发表于 2025-3-27 23:39:11
Conclusions,uction of domestication and digitization as key concepts for the research agenda to the robot rights debate and the terminological recommendations. This chapter ends on an encouragement to realize the relational approach by arguing for it in the public square. Same with the animal rights movement, t
引导
发表于 2025-3-28 04:18:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2242/224174/224174_38.png