Anonymous
发表于 2025-3-30 11:41:33
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77066-4y and presents us with a God that is a totally admirable person, worthy of deep religious reverence and love. It is not surprising to me that some of the authors who have written on it declare that this is the only brand of theism they could accept.
Bricklayer
发表于 2025-3-30 13:33:19
Pricing Interest-Rate Derivativesnnings in Plato and Aristotle through its fulfillment in Hegel, metaphysics has in fact been ‘onto-theology.’ This means, in Heidegger’s terminology, that the difference between Being and beings — the ‘ontological difference’ — has been overlooked, because Being (as the event of coming into unconcea
Nutrient
发表于 2025-3-30 17:40:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2242/224103/224103_53.png
Canary
发表于 2025-3-30 23:07:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2242/224103/224103_54.png
BARK
发表于 2025-3-31 00:56:38
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9702-9phy may have more obvious parallels with Indian or Chinese ways of thinking than Western.. In his references specifically to Buddhism, however, Whitehead is largely negative.. Hartshorne has seen the relationship more positively and has noted points of affinity as well as difference. This paper will
Irksome
发表于 2025-3-31 06:30:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2242/224103/224103_56.png
争议的苹果
发表于 2025-3-31 12:26:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2242/224103/224103_57.png