健壮 发表于 2025-3-26 23:38:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2238/223720/223720_31.pngengrave 发表于 2025-3-27 03:05:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2238/223720/223720_32.pngSEMI 发表于 2025-3-27 07:30:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2238/223720/223720_33.png爱好 发表于 2025-3-27 10:33:07
Some Pragmatic Aspects of the Methodology of Johann Heinrich Lambertglish has concentrated not so much on Lambert’s philosophy itself as on the extent of his influence on Kant. Certainly, this is no illegitimate concern. But by this focusing of interest on this single aspect much of Lambert’s enormous oeuvre. has been neglected.concubine 发表于 2025-3-27 14:10:10
Genetic Epistemology in the Context of Evolutionary Epistemology all Baldwin’s. I would have liked to add to the above list of names a few German ones such as Wundt, Simmel, Sigwert and British ones such as Hobhouse. These additions would have made the picture more complete and more complex. In fact, too complex a picture for the present, hence, my more limited scope.chronology 发表于 2025-3-27 17:55:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2238/223720/223720_36.pngobstinate 发表于 2025-3-28 00:34:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2238/223720/223720_37.png尊敬 发表于 2025-3-28 05:33:36
In Praise of Cumulative Progress He maintained that a form of knowledge is only on the “secure path of a science” when, amongst other things, the various thinkers add their result to those of previous thinkers and are not obliged, each time, to begin right from the beginning, as happens in metaphysics (see Kant 1787, B VII).cacophony 发表于 2025-3-28 10:03:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2238/223720/223720_39.png招致 发表于 2025-3-28 11:26:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2238/223720/223720_40.png