要求比…更好
发表于 2025-3-25 03:19:35
Outlines of Perennial Philosophylling students, this approach enables a broad and located view of student behaviour that seeks to develop and extend students’ understandings of themselves and others. A key premise here is that many ‘misbehaviours’ in classrooms are associated with issues of identity and power and, in particular, t
CAMP
发表于 2025-3-25 08:25:22
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3067-3chools. This chapter presents a case study of six young people from Sudanese refugee backgrounds. With a focus on discipline and student-teacher relationships, I argue that the previous ‘hidden injuries of schooling’ experienced by the students continued to shape their experiences of school in Austr
MEN
发表于 2025-3-25 12:31:19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-3067-3 reconcile and make decisions about the plethora of legislation, policies and practices that relate to student behaviour in schools. This policy work is messy and complex, and influenced by ideological differences about the status children and the ways to ‘discipline’ them. The challenge for schools
自制
发表于 2025-3-25 16:43:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2236/223558/223558_24.png
muster
发表于 2025-3-25 21:17:25
Anna Sullivan,Bruce Johnson,Bill LucasPresents an alternative perspective on behaviour management in schools.Brings together leading Australian scholars to answer key questions about behaviour in school environments.Answers back’ to calls
wall-stress
发表于 2025-3-26 00:46:08
http://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/223558.jpg
entrance
发表于 2025-3-26 08:02:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2236/223558/223558_27.png
金桌活画面
发表于 2025-3-26 09:04:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2236/223558/223558_28.png
Mutter
发表于 2025-3-26 14:55:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2236/223558/223558_29.png
荣幸
发表于 2025-3-26 20:05:06
,Daring to Disagree About School ‘Discipline’: An Australian Case Study of a Media-Led Backlash,ated with children’s rights, in particular by notoriously outrageous ‘shock jocks’ on talkback radio and some television networks. These revelations present academics and researchers with a difficult choice between taking further reputational risks by continuing to engage in public debates about how