Sedative 发表于 2025-3-23 11:45:06
,Young’s modulus of light metal alloys,hat we test laws without the . antecedent. But at least when the . antecedent is there we have an explicit acknowledgment of important procedures we must take in the design of the experiments — i.e., procedures to control for “all interferences”, even those we cannot identify under the concepts of any known theory.意外的成功 发表于 2025-3-23 15:47:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2234/223374/223374_12.png车床 发表于 2025-3-23 20:01:00
Plasticity of light metal alloys,the analysis of . laws are, on their own terms, complete failures. I sketch a more adequate alternative account of the content of causal generalizations in the special sciences which I argue should replace the . conception.Spirometry 发表于 2025-3-24 02:13:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2234/223374/223374_14.png没血色 发表于 2025-3-24 06:26:21
, Lost,e rendered untestable by the mere addition of the CP operator. Thus, “CP all Fs are Gs”, when read as a straightforward statement of fact, cannot be the stuff of scientific theory. Rather, we suggest that when “.” appears in scientific works it plays a pragmatic role of pointing to more respectable claims.浪费物质 发表于 2025-3-24 07:27:00
,, — An Inadequate Representation for Biological Contingency,exact and inexact sciences. In particular, a detailed account of the types and degrees of contingency found in the domain of biology permits a more adequate understanding of the relations among the sciences.projectile 发表于 2025-3-24 13:40:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2234/223374/223374_17.png执拗 发表于 2025-3-24 17:37:28
In Favor of Laws that are Not , After All,hat we test laws without the . antecedent. But at least when the . antecedent is there we have an explicit acknowledgment of important procedures we must take in the design of the experiments — i.e., procedures to control for “all interferences”, even those we cannot identify under the concepts of any known theory.葡萄糖 发表于 2025-3-24 19:11:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2234/223374/223374_19.png把手 发表于 2025-3-25 00:12:59
ects the most prominent philosophers of science in the field and presents a lively, controversial, but well-integrated, highly original and up-to-date discussion of the issue. It will be the reference book in the coming years concerning .ceteris paribus. laws.978-90-481-6173-7978-94-017-1009-1