Outspoken
发表于 2025-3-25 05:52:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222648/222648_21.png
Nucleate
发表于 2025-3-25 10:31:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222648/222648_22.png
hereditary
发表于 2025-3-25 15:01:37
Das innerbetriebliche Kontrollsystemious way to spell out what it is for a theory to be ontologically committed to entities of some kind appears to make nonsense of the way we use ontological commitments to evaluate the theory in a very common kind of case.
轻浮思想
发表于 2025-3-25 18:48:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222648/222648_24.png
CON
发表于 2025-3-25 20:00:31
Online - Die Zukunft der Zeitung?on in Philosophy at Boston University, from whence he proceeded to Emmanuel College, Cambridge, as a Ph.D. student, and also attended lectures at Oxford. In 1954 he came to my department at the University of Adelaide as Lecturer, and was quickly promoted Senior Lecturer and later Reader. From 1966–1
GLUE
发表于 2025-3-26 01:39:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222648/222648_26.png
高原
发表于 2025-3-26 05:03:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222648/222648_27.png
fastness
发表于 2025-3-26 09:40:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222648/222648_28.png
飞行员
发表于 2025-3-26 13:09:37
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-12272-2ves that was, in effect, like the rigidity theses to be made famous by Saul Kripke (1971, 1980) and David Kaplan (1973, 1975, 1979a, 1979b, 1988a). He also had a view of definite descriptions that was similar to the view that Donnellan was about to publish (1966, 1968). The ‘Fido’-Fido theory of nam
绊住
发表于 2025-3-26 19:31:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222648/222648_30.png