蒸发
发表于 2025-3-28 14:48:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222637/222637_41.png
Flawless
发表于 2025-3-28 21:28:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08826-4unified structure but instead is merely . there were the scientific entities (electrons, protons and so on) which, if they had existed, would have articulated that structure. This stand, of course, poses a problem for his own frequently expressed view that laws of nature are nothing more ontological
FEMUR
发表于 2025-3-29 02:35:11
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08818-9This comment is based first upon a letter that I sent to Brian Ellis about his paper, and second upon the quite elaborate reply that he returned to me. The reply, for which I thank him, gave me a much better grip on his position and so assisted me in the present enterprise.
纹章
发表于 2025-3-29 04:21:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222637/222637_44.png
DEAWL
发表于 2025-3-29 11:09:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222637/222637_45.png
凌辱
发表于 2025-3-29 12:52:04
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-08822-6If a proposition is entailed by a set of laws of nature, does that make it a law? Call this the . There are two intuitively appealing ways of thinking about laws which produce sharply conflicting answers to this question.
阉割
发表于 2025-3-29 18:04:21
Comment on EllisThis comment is based first upon a letter that I sent to Brian Ellis about his paper, and second upon the quite elaborate reply that he returned to me. The reply, for which I thank him, gave me a much better grip on his position and so assisted me in the present enterprise.
Sigmoidoscopy
发表于 2025-3-29 22:03:35
Response to David ArmstrongThis reply is based on my letter to David Armstrong, which was in response to his earlier criticisms of my paper on Causal Powers and Laws of Nature. I have amended my reply to take account of the objections made in the revised version of his response. I am grateful for the opportunity he has given me to clarify my position.
拉开这车床
发表于 2025-3-30 01:01:32
Scientific EllisianismEllis defends a theory which is of great interest and importance: scientific essentialism. Science seeks the essential properties of things in the world, and the necessary truths which follow from them, argues Ellis. The core doctrine of the Ellis theory, I take to be this:
CIS
发表于 2025-3-30 04:22:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222637/222637_50.png