陶醉
发表于 2025-3-25 04:48:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222635/222635_21.png
Ingest
发表于 2025-3-25 09:43:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222635/222635_22.png
Notorious
发表于 2025-3-25 14:07:41
Book 1991y different areas of philosophy. Or that he combines to an unusual degree rigorous standards with a very wide perspective. Or even that in his path-breaking accounts of algebra, of !)escartes, of Kant and of Russell, he showed in new and profound ways how the histories of science and philosophy coul
Intentional
发表于 2025-3-25 17:30:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222635/222635_24.png
conference
发表于 2025-3-25 22:32:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222635/222635_25.png
喷出
发表于 2025-3-26 02:28:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222635/222635_26.png
myalgia
发表于 2025-3-26 07:36:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222635/222635_27.png
龙卷风
发表于 2025-3-26 10:15:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222635/222635_28.png
fabricate
发表于 2025-3-26 15:05:10
,Kant’s “Platonic” Argument in Behalf of the a Priori Character of the Representation of Space,e in it. Gottfried Martin has given a little more spice to the arguments of the metaphysical exposition in behalf of the . character of the representation of space by qualifying the first as “platonic” and the second as “aristotelian.”. In what sense does the first deserve such dignity? On the other hand, are there any problems with it?
租约
发表于 2025-3-26 20:03:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2227/222635/222635_30.png