Allodynia 发表于 2025-3-25 05:14:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2225/222420/222420_21.png字形刻痕 发表于 2025-3-25 10:43:21
Andreas F. Kelletatbeen defended in various ways by collectivists; however, these defenses fail to meet the logical problem posed by Narveson. If strong collective responsibility does not entail that any particular group member is responsible, then we cannot identify the particular group that is allegedly responsible.CRAFT 发表于 2025-3-25 14:28:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2225/222420/222420_23.png摘要记录 发表于 2025-3-25 16:24:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2225/222420/222420_24.png相容 发表于 2025-3-25 20:33:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2225/222420/222420_25.pngAER 发表于 2025-3-26 00:47:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2225/222420/222420_26.pngpericardium 发表于 2025-3-26 07:01:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2225/222420/222420_27.png装勇敢地做 发表于 2025-3-26 12:04:26
Psychology and Aestheticsthe psychological implications of this theology. In his “Thoughts on the Constitution of Human Nature as Represented in the Systems of Modern Philosophers,” Byrom has perhaps Hutcheson particularly in mind; but through Hutcheson, he is attacking the sources of Enlightenment psychology, Descartes and Locke.GNAW 发表于 2025-3-26 16:33:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2225/222420/222420_29.png减至最低 发表于 2025-3-26 17:01:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2225/222420/222420_30.png