multiply 发表于 2025-3-28 17:27:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2222/222189/222189_41.pngmaverick 发表于 2025-3-28 20:57:07
Mihnea Dobre,Tammy NydenThe only full-length study on the topic of Cartesian Empiricism.Provides a comprehensive guide to over twenty-five seventeenth century Cartesians for whom experiment and observation played a key role.exacerbate 发表于 2025-3-29 02:50:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2222/222189/222189_43.png原谅 发表于 2025-3-29 03:29:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2222/222189/222189_44.pngcapsaicin 发表于 2025-3-29 09:21:56
978-94-024-0580-4Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013正常 发表于 2025-3-29 12:20:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2222/222189/222189_46.png流浪 发表于 2025-3-29 18:59:03
Real Singularities and Complex Geometry,the denial of substantial forms and real qualities. Also condemned was the theory of matter and place: extension as the principal attribute of matter, the indefinite extension of the world, and the impossibility of the void. With these objections, came an increased critique of hyperbolic doubt. TheGraphite 发表于 2025-3-29 19:46:17
Real Singularities with a Milnor Fibration,following questions. (1) Is there a difference in the way Descartes and Rohault deal with experiments? I state that there is no doctrinal difference between them: the experiments they carry out are of the same order; they attribute the same epistemological functions to them; they share the same ontoHemiplegia 发表于 2025-3-30 03:27:49
Real Singularities with a Milnor Fibration,s been regarded as basically flawed on account of its incompatibility with Newton’s approach to natural philosophy, which was to dominate much of eighteenth-century thought. In this paper it is argued that, on the contrary, both Descartes and some of his most tenacious Dutch admirers did not eschewexcrete 发表于 2025-3-30 07:44:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2222/222189/222189_50.png