心神不宁
发表于 2025-3-23 09:50:48
2634-5994 ne specific issue. The book will be of interest not only to Carnap scholars but to all those interested in the history of analytical philosophy.978-0-230-23539-7Series ISSN 2634-5994 Series E-ISSN 2634-6001
消音器
发表于 2025-3-23 14:38:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2222/222146/222146_12.png
世俗
发表于 2025-3-23 20:28:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2222/222146/222146_13.png
莎草
发表于 2025-3-23 23:25:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2222/222146/222146_14.png
话
发表于 2025-3-24 05:25:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2222/222146/222146_15.png
儿童
发表于 2025-3-24 08:23:58
N. C. Markatos,M. Cross,N. RhodesIn his ‘Intellectual Autobiography’, Carnap recalled what Bergmann would call the ‘linguistic turn’ (1964, p. 177) in philosophy in the days of the Vienna Circle:
Fortify
发表于 2025-3-24 12:59:45
Zahlendarstellung und Rundungsfehler,Carnap and Quine are usually presented as great philosophical opponents. And so they were. Their opposition should not blind us to the equally significant affinities in their philosophical outlooks. Burton Dreben encapsulates both the affinity and opposition at the end of his paper ‘Quine’:
CORE
发表于 2025-3-24 16:39:56
From Wittgenstein’s Prison to the Boundless Ocean: Carnap’s Dream of Logical Syntax is a revolutionary book. How did the author of the ., whose viewpoint is so very different, come to write such a book? It was a drama in two acts, comprising not one but . major breakthroughs within less than two years. The first of these, in January 1931, was the one Carnap describes vividly in his autobiography:
独裁政府
发表于 2025-3-24 22:58:03
Carnap on Logical Consequence for Languages I and IIIn his ‘Intellectual Autobiography’, Carnap recalled what Bergmann would call the ‘linguistic turn’ (1964, p. 177) in philosophy in the days of the Vienna Circle:
lymphedema
发表于 2025-3-24 23:53:28
From Tolerance to Reciprocal ContainmentCarnap and Quine are usually presented as great philosophical opponents. And so they were. Their opposition should not blind us to the equally significant affinities in their philosophical outlooks. Burton Dreben encapsulates both the affinity and opposition at the end of his paper ‘Quine’: