painkillers
发表于 2025-3-25 05:59:59
Concluding Remarks,he quantificational meaning of the sentence in question is derived. Therefore, I have instead argued that -., -. and -. are quantifiers, performing generic, universal and additive quantification, respectively.
预测
发表于 2025-3-25 10:32:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2214/221345/221345_22.png
小鹿
发表于 2025-3-25 13:41:51
Hend A. Hadi,Loay E. George,Enas Kh. Hassanuoddy and Northern Sotho have been given in Evans (1995), Jelinek (1995), Bruening (2008), and Zerbian and Krifka (2008), respectively and it is found that A-quantifiers might surface as verbal affixes, incorporated roots, preverbs, auxiliary verbs, as well as independent adverbs and PPs. Some of their examples are given below for illustration.
palpitate
发表于 2025-3-25 19:46:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2214/221345/221345_24.png
Encumber
发表于 2025-3-25 20:37:30
Introduction,uoddy and Northern Sotho have been given in Evans (1995), Jelinek (1995), Bruening (2008), and Zerbian and Krifka (2008), respectively and it is found that A-quantifiers might surface as verbal affixes, incorporated roots, preverbs, auxiliary verbs, as well as independent adverbs and PPs. Some of their examples are given below for illustration.
Cumbersome
发表于 2025-3-26 01:37:11
The Quantification Accessibility Hierarchy for Affixal Quantifiers, they can interpret with all verbal arguments. These suffixes are essentially quantificational, since it is from the suffix that the quantificational meaning of the sentence in question is derived. Hence, any analyses which aim to adequately capture the semantics of these verbal suffixes must account for their quantificational meaning.
茁壮成长
发表于 2025-3-26 06:56:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2214/221345/221345_27.png
intelligible
发表于 2025-3-26 08:38:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2214/221345/221345_28.png
Ethics
发表于 2025-3-26 16:01:38
Previous Analyses on Quantification and Cantonese Verbal Suffixes, 1974; Barwise and Cooper 1981), with the semantics of universal and existential noun phrases defined in terms of set theory. Second, it is Partee’s twofold classification of D- and A-quantifications, with A-quantifiers further divided into true A-quantifiers along the line of Lewis and Heim and lex
moribund
发表于 2025-3-26 20:02:46
The Quantification Accessibility Hierarchy for Affixal Quantifiers,marker -., imperfective marker -. and progressive marker -., which are generally considered to be falling under the aspectual group. However, the problem is even if it is correct to claim for their non-aspectual nature, the basic semantics of -., -. and -. remains unknown. As discussed in ., despite