细丝 发表于 2025-3-25 06:57:41

http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2214/221332/221332_21.png

Volatile-Oils 发表于 2025-3-25 11:10:58

http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2214/221332/221332_22.png

AROMA 发表于 2025-3-25 14:53:06

http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2214/221332/221332_23.png

组成 发表于 2025-3-25 19:39:58

http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2214/221332/221332_24.png

iodides 发表于 2025-3-25 20:11:32

Kalle Tomingas,Margus Kliimask,Tanel Tammets are not so straightforwardly a means of liberation. The defense of the idea that originality is only possible from working within a tradition still rests on a narrow theory of influence as tantamount to power. The fraught nature of trying to achieve a degree of originality is proof of the power wi

我怕被刺穿 发表于 2025-3-26 01:04:24

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10518-5n influence and originality, again, to a theoretical pulley system: the more influence increases, the more originality falls (and vice-versa), how can this be attributed to the work of such a ground-breaking thinker as Nietzsche? As demonstrated in the previous chapter, this model has been widely ac

感激小女 发表于 2025-3-26 07:49:34

http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2214/221332/221332_27.png

STAT 发表于 2025-3-26 10:17:37

http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2214/221332/221332_28.png

Costume 发表于 2025-3-26 13:32:04

http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2214/221332/221332_29.png

机械 发表于 2025-3-26 19:24:42

Introduction,r to demonstrate a genuine respect for a diversity of histories of political thought, teachers of political theory do well to acknowledge a plurality of canons each representing a particular history, epistemic community, or intergenerational struggle. To make the case for preserving the traditional
页: 1 2 [3] 4
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Canon Controversies in Political Thought; Two Theories of Infl Dominic Welburn Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), u