conservative 发表于 2025-3-28 15:34:30
,Duhem, Quine and Grünbaum on Falsification,A number of empirically-minded philosophers hold that there is a class of ‘basic’ (or ‘protocol’) sentences each of which is, in the words of Karl Popper, “a statement of singular fact” (, p. 43). Many of these philosophers also maintain, with Popper, that there are empirical theories which are ‘falsifiable’ in the sense that each such theoryRuptured-Disk 发表于 2025-3-28 20:59:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2211/221002/221002_42.png障碍 发表于 2025-3-29 00:06:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2211/221002/221002_43.png斗争 发表于 2025-3-29 05:29:44
,Einführung in die Welt des Neuromarketing,sical theory and pronounce it good or bad is the comparison between the consequences of this theory and the experimental laws it has to represent and classify. Now that we have minutely analyzed the characteristics of a physical experiment and of a physical law, we can establish the principles that体贴 发表于 2025-3-29 09:24:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2211/221002/221002_45.png背信 发表于 2025-3-29 13:36:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77829-5r false, if and only if either (1) it is analytic or contradictory — in which case it is said to have purely logical meaning or significance — or else (2) it is capable, at least potentially, of test by experiential evidence — in which case it is said to have empirical meaning or significance. The bSTIT 发表于 2025-3-29 18:59:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2211/221002/221002_47.png一窝小鸟 发表于 2025-3-29 21:52:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2211/221002/221002_48.pngPainstaking 发表于 2025-3-30 00:44:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2211/221002/221002_49.pngExuberance 发表于 2025-3-30 05:27:16
Hans-Joachim Bentz,Andreas Dierkscially Duhem. Specifically, Grünbaum has assailed the view that a single hypothesis can never be conclusively falsified. Grünbaum claims that the conventionalists’ insistence on the immunity of hypotheses from falsification is neither logically valid nor scientifically sound. Directing the weight of