Sinus-Node
发表于 2025-3-23 10:38:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2210/220988/220988_11.png
ELATE
发表于 2025-3-23 16:41:29
Diagnostiek van Neurologische AandoeningenIn this chapter, I will reject the Lucretian symmetry argument by criticising some proposals from recent philosophers. To achieve this, let me explicate the Lucretian symmetry argument first.
违抗
发表于 2025-3-23 21:20:06
The Epicurean Argument,The Epicurean argument has provided the classical objection to the widely held view that death can be a harm to the person who dies. To attain the central aim of this book, first of all, I want to refute Epicurus in this chapter.
骚动
发表于 2025-3-24 01:20:46
The Desire-thwarting Theory,This chapter is concerned with the questions: Is the desire-thwarting theory acceptable? If not, why? Let me outline this theory first.
oxidize
发表于 2025-3-24 04:37:40
The Deprivation Theory,The deprivation theory is the most popular anti-Epicurean view.1 Silverstein calls this view the standard argument against the Epicurean view.2 In this chapter, I want to investigate whether or not this very popular anti-Epicurean view is satisfactory. To begin this task, let me first illustrate the deprivation theory.
形容词
发表于 2025-3-24 09:41:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2210/220988/220988_16.png
Intersect
发表于 2025-3-24 12:36:14
The Lucretian Symmetry Argument,In this chapter, I will reject the Lucretian symmetry argument by criticising some proposals from recent philosophers. To achieve this, let me explicate the Lucretian symmetry argument first.
Communal
发表于 2025-3-24 17:22:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2210/220988/220988_18.png
Ledger
发表于 2025-3-24 22:24:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2210/220988/220988_19.png
轻率看法
发表于 2025-3-24 23:23:54
Conclusion, him I have shown, in Chapter One, that the Epicurean argument is defective. Hence, at this point, I can at least claim that it is possible that death . be a harm to the person who dies. However, to really secure this conclusion, it is necessary to give further justification.