analogous
发表于 2025-3-30 10:55:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2205/220460/220460_51.png
Laconic
发表于 2025-3-30 14:22:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2205/220460/220460_52.png
假
发表于 2025-3-30 18:58:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2205/220460/220460_53.png
callous
发表于 2025-3-30 21:37:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2205/220460/220460_54.png
Expressly
发表于 2025-3-31 01:19:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2205/220460/220460_55.png
aggressor
发表于 2025-3-31 06:13:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2205/220460/220460_56.png
VALID
发表于 2025-3-31 10:13:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2205/220460/220460_57.png
Eviction
发表于 2025-3-31 17:21:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2205/220460/220460_58.png
NAIVE
发表于 2025-3-31 20:23:24
,On the reduction of chocs bisimulation to π-calculus bisimulation, a formalization of the notion of bisimulation for Chocs. In this paper we suggest a more effective way to reason about this notion by means of an embedding of Chocs into a richer calculus endowed with a notion of ‘activation’ channel which we christen .. is the name of a new internal action which i
BLANK
发表于 2025-4-1 00:30:16
,A theory of bisimulation for the π-calculus,valences, ∼ is preserved by name substitution and (hence) by input prefix. The differences among all these equivalences already appear in the sublanguage without restriction: Here the definition of ∼ can be factorised into a “standard” part which, modulo the different syntax of actions, is the CCS b