忍受 发表于 2025-3-27 00:25:56
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0218-2le by means of a deterministic hypergraph grammar. Since finiteness of regular graphs is decidable, this yields, as a corollary, a decision procedure for the finiteness problem of context-free processes wrt. bisimulation equivalence.reptile 发表于 2025-3-27 03:35:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2205/220442/220442_32.png漂亮 发表于 2025-3-27 08:55:05
Testing probabilistic automata,ite traces only. The second kind of preorder is an extension to the probabilistic framework of the testing preorders of De Nicola and Hennessy. We show that under assumptions of finite branching and strong convergence the two kinds of preorders coincide.Collision 发表于 2025-3-27 10:13:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2205/220442/220442_34.png有偏见 发表于 2025-3-27 15:06:18
On transformations of concurrent object programs,The correctness of the rules is proved using a semantic definition by translation to a mobile-process calculus. The main theoretical development concerns the notions of confluence and partial confluence.形容词词尾 发表于 2025-3-27 19:55:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2205/220442/220442_36.pngSlit-Lamp 发表于 2025-3-27 23:27:29
Internationalisation of Industrial R&Dhes to priorities, our algebra only allows actions to preempt others at the same “location” and therefore captures a notion of .. Using Park‘s and Milner‘s notion of strong bisimulation as a basis, we develop a behavioral congruence and axiomatize it for finite processes; we also derive an associate禁止 发表于 2025-3-28 03:00:05
The Global Distribution of R&D Activities to be carried in transitions. The main advantage of this generalization is that a wider class of processes can be represented as finite state graphs. Two kinds of operational semantics, ground and symbolic, are given to such graphs. On top of them both ground and symbolic bisimulations are definedCLOT 发表于 2025-3-28 10:08:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/23/2205/220442/220442_39.pngvector 发表于 2025-3-28 12:22:05
National Systems of Innovation in Comparisontransitions with events. They differ for the choice of a . versus a . notion of event which induces considerable differences and makes the two models suitable for different purposes. This opens the problem of investigating their mutual relationships, to which this paper gives a fully comprehensive a