战役
发表于 2025-3-25 05:03:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1926/192567/192567_21.png
Polydipsia
发表于 2025-3-25 08:04:43
,The Jewish Resister (1987–2015),e Treasury for the evaluation of government programmes, on which I recently wrote a brief guide.. This approach is not intended to replace more traditional methods but to add to them and to improve the rigour. In particular I look for opportunities to bring measures of quantification to the analysis.
scoliosis
发表于 2025-3-25 11:38:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1926/192567/192567_23.png
无节奏
发表于 2025-3-25 16:18:11
,The Impact of Byron’s Writings: An Evaluative Approach,e Treasury for the evaluation of government programmes, on which I recently wrote a brief guide.. This approach is not intended to replace more traditional methods but to add to them and to improve the rigour. In particular I look for opportunities to bring measures of quantification to the analysis.
招人嫉妒
发表于 2025-3-25 22:08:47
Continuities and Discontinuities of Language and Voice in Dryden, Pope, and Byron,st in all Byron’s corpus to satire in the manner of Pope and Dryden. Wordsworth did not like them. He wrote to John Scott (18 April 1816):.Wordsworth’s comment is cogent. The first thing we notice about these lines is that they have an ‘over the top’ quality which makes the voice unPopeian.
Memorial
发表于 2025-3-26 03:50:30
http://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/192567.jpg
Deduct
发表于 2025-3-26 04:32:09
,Righteous Gentiles (1987–2011),I begin with a mouldy anecdote, a late supplement to that once-flourishing industry — now part of the imagination’s rust belt — called ‘Curiosities of Literature’.
CLOUT
发表于 2025-3-26 11:15:17
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58012-2A simple archetype is my point of departure: the feminist representation of the male as phallocentric patriarch. Byron fits. He is both libertine and lord. The ‘masterwork’ is recognised as . The title reaffirms the archetype.
载货清单
发表于 2025-3-26 14:41:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1926/192567/192567_29.png
Prostatism
发表于 2025-3-26 18:18:08
,‘My Brain is Feminine’: Byron and the Poetry of Deception,I begin with a mouldy anecdote, a late supplement to that once-flourishing industry — now part of the imagination’s rust belt — called ‘Curiosities of Literature’.