ENDOW
发表于 2025-3-26 21:12:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1922/192152/192152_31.png
Cholesterol
发表于 2025-3-27 03:45:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1922/192152/192152_32.png
DEVIL
发表于 2025-3-27 08:24:01
,Tragflügel und hydraulische Maschinen,. The second dimension refers to the relationship that we have to the intuitions that have emerged. Do we trust them just because they are our intuitions? Or do we need to have a critical relationship to them? Can our gut not be wrong?
remission
发表于 2025-3-27 12:49:14
In the Cracks of Conventions,nagement. Yet one of the outstanding features of Welch is that his way of doing things cannot be reduced to a set of techniques or formulas. Business, he maintains, is not a great science. It is underpinned by being able to trust in “one’s gut.” His success lies in his uncanny business feel.
NAG
发表于 2025-3-27 15:28:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1922/192152/192152_35.png
Genetics
发表于 2025-3-27 21:05:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1922/192152/192152_36.png
跳动
发表于 2025-3-27 23:45:50
From a Science to a Philosophy of Management,of instability, it is precisely the pattern of regularities that is disrupted. Science is based on a process of looking for regularities. Philosophy is an activity that occurs when we cannot expect regularities.
ethereal
发表于 2025-3-28 04:09:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1922/192152/192152_38.png
cuticle
发表于 2025-3-28 07:56:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1922/192152/192152_39.png
沉积物
发表于 2025-3-28 12:52:47
The Socratic Perplexity of a Leader: The Case of Mort Meyerson,. The second dimension refers to the relationship that we have to the intuitions that have emerged. Do we trust them just because they are our intuitions? Or do we need to have a critical relationship to them? Can our gut not be wrong?