Meditative
发表于 2025-3-23 11:24:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1920/191967/191967_11.png
光滑
发表于 2025-3-23 14:04:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1920/191967/191967_12.png
notice
发表于 2025-3-23 22:04:53
Civil Servant, Civil Societyved that the leadership of the French Revolution was not in the hands of a ‘rising commercial, financial and industrial class‘.. The revisionist interpretation of the French Revolution that followed – in which politics rather than social change defined events – had little room for a ‘bourgeoisie’. N
腐蚀
发表于 2025-3-24 01:21:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1920/191967/191967_14.png
cravat
发表于 2025-3-24 04:35:51
The Social Politics of Bureaucracyeported how ministerial reforms had centred on those who had ‘spent part of the last year offering proof … of their devotion to the Bourbon dynasty, while still engaged by their oath to the Emperor Napoleon’.. Restoration newspaper editors were keen to heap opprobrium on Carnot in particular, who ha
Restenosis
发表于 2025-3-24 07:38:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1920/191967/191967_16.png
frivolous
发表于 2025-3-24 14:24:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1920/191967/191967_17.png
MORT
发表于 2025-3-24 16:10:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1920/191967/191967_18.png
BILK
发表于 2025-3-24 19:44:43
978-1-349-33851-1Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2012
仲裁者
发表于 2025-3-25 00:57:46
B. T. Smith,J. M. Boyle,C. B. Molerhe . in 1791, writing that the object of his most justified contempt was the bureaucrat, product of the ‘famine pact’, harbinger of a ‘new mode of servitude’.. The word ‘bureaucrat’ – distinct from both ‘agent’ and ‘administrator’ – was then officially codified by . in 1796 as an ‘expression of cont