Cultivate 发表于 2025-3-25 06:41:19

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48768-5and even more in tune with paraconsistent logicians, I make the implicit assumption that it would give a chance to the cause of Heraclitus — Hegel. This far-reaching philosophical hypothesis assumes that some of the contradictory and antinomic propositions we come across in rather immature scientifi

peritonitis 发表于 2025-3-25 08:55:57

Potenzen, Logarithmus, Umkehrfunktionen,antable to take in science as a pattern of rationality, and to consider scientific activity as being more rational than other types of human activity. Else, its consideration as an abstract construction with dogmatic and restrictive characteristics — or as a void of content and wholly evaluative con

gnarled 发表于 2025-3-25 15:05:39

http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1920/191909/191909_23.png

安定 发表于 2025-3-25 16:59:06

http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1920/191909/191909_24.png

PANIC 发表于 2025-3-25 20:58:36

http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1920/191909/191909_25.png

Fallibility 发表于 2025-3-26 04:09:47

http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1920/191909/191909_26.png

补充 发表于 2025-3-26 04:43:33

Potenzen, Logarithmus, Umkehrfunktionen,tulated by some proponents of cognitive linguistics, are compared to other mental representations such as prototypes, archetypes and stereotypes. The old controversy for realism or cognitivism in science, respectively in linguistics, is again brought to the fore. The author is in favor of a dualisti

镇压 发表于 2025-3-26 10:07:59

http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1920/191909/191909_28.png

Finasteride 发表于 2025-3-26 12:39:15

http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1920/191909/191909_29.png

subacute 发表于 2025-3-26 20:37:54

Wahrscheinlichkeitsverteilungen,ational line between the two traditional contexts of scrutinizing scientific research. Studies in the context of justification advocate this specificity by postulating a cognitive essence (e.g., scientific method, invariant standards for rational scientific behavior, primitive language of the “proto
页: 1 2 [3] 4 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Bulgarian Studies in the Philosophy of Science; Dimitri Ginev Book 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2003 Gottfried Wilhelm L