完整 发表于 2025-3-23 09:58:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16810-1e. On the one hand there were the schools of formal logic and epistemology whose textual tradition emerged out of the works of the Buddhist scholar Dignāga and his commentator Dharmakīrti. On the other, there were the esoteric textual traditions that would come to be known as the Buddhist tantras. T鸽子 发表于 2025-3-23 16:44:50
Introduction,on’s endeavour to examine a hitherto uncharted terrain. The essay offers an insight into the compatibility between Buddhism and Linguistics by examining some areas which lie at the interface of the two disciplines and concludes by offering a brief summary of each of the essays in the volume.SPALL 发表于 2025-3-23 19:22:46
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67413-1Buddhism in India; Buddhist philosophy of language; Abhidharma; Madhyamaka; Yogācāra; Zen Buddhism; ontoloTrabeculoplasty 发表于 2025-3-24 01:06:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1916/191507/191507_14.pngfibroblast 发表于 2025-3-24 02:29:30
miotics; parallels between Buddhism and the human mind; markThis edited collection brings linguistics into contact with a millennia of works by Buddhist scholars. Examining the Buddhist contemplative tradition and its extensive writings from an interdisciplinary perspective, the authors bridge the gDeference 发表于 2025-3-24 09:54:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1916/191507/191507_16.png过分 发表于 2025-3-24 13:37:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1916/191507/191507_17.pngAngiogenesis 发表于 2025-3-24 16:54:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1916/191507/191507_18.png白杨 发表于 2025-3-24 21:13:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1916/191507/191507_19.pngRestenosis 发表于 2025-3-25 01:58:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1916/191507/191507_20.png