LAP
发表于 2025-3-25 05:37:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1916/191505/191505_21.png
Semblance
发表于 2025-3-25 10:31:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1916/191505/191505_22.png
outrage
发表于 2025-3-25 12:32:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1916/191505/191505_23.png
卷发
发表于 2025-3-25 17:58:06
Macmillan Master Series (Science)sire for me to visit this place; I have been involved in Buddhist and Christian dialogue over a long time, but this conference is a highlight of my dialogue experience. I have been asked to talk about suffering in the light of our time; our time in the light of suffering: Buddha’s first Holy Truth.
不持续就爆
发表于 2025-3-25 21:30:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17755-4as the polarity of being and nothing’ in Buddhism. He also points out that ‘there seems to be a clear difference in the predications being made’ in these two cases. So far, I understand that Scharlemann agrees with me in making a distinction between God and . in terms of being and nothingness. Howev
勋章
发表于 2025-3-26 03:20:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1916/191505/191505_26.png
Infusion
发表于 2025-3-26 06:48:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1916/191505/191505_27.png
faddish
发表于 2025-3-26 09:21:10
The changing conditions of employmenttiness’,. Hans Küng raises a number of crucial issues for Buddhist-Christian dialogue. Due to the restriction of space, however, I would like to limit myself to answering the following three issues which I believe to be the most essential. First, is Abe’s approach a true dialogical hermeneutic? Seco
Resistance
发表于 2025-3-26 16:40:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1916/191505/191505_29.png
Alopecia-Areata
发表于 2025-3-26 19:17:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1916/191505/191505_30.png