GOAD 发表于 2025-3-25 06:07:10
The National Institute of Economic and Social Research: The Shifting Fortunes of Expert Arbiters,ots in post-war economic decision-making and strong links with academics and economists at the Bank of England. As an organisation that produces econometric forecasts and research funded by government departments, it faced two main challenges after 2008; first, a growing mistrust of their work—even纹章 发表于 2025-3-25 10:54:46
Policy Exchange: The Pros and Cons of Political Centrality,ct adherence to Thatcherite ideas. Parallel to the rise of David Cameron, PX became ever more politically connected, while producing policy proposals on areas hitherto relatively neglected by the centre-right (e.g., education, social policy, healthcare). Indeed, the ideas behind the ‘Big Society’ plInvertebrate 发表于 2025-3-25 15:23:45
Conclusions: Intervening on Shifting Sands,actice, whether they convey any type of intellectual or institutional change, and what these changes could reveal of their broader environment. Second, this chapter proposes understanding the intellectual changes think tanks underwent—as well as their import in politics and policy—through their func共同时代 发表于 2025-3-25 18:52:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-3863-3ey sought to position themselves as experts in the context of a perceived failure of expertise, the 2008 global financial crisis. This is followed by an overview of the institutional characteristics of British think tanks, their history, and the relevant literature on the subject. This chapter also神刊 发表于 2025-3-25 21:42:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1912/191179/191179_25.png大包裹 发表于 2025-3-26 01:54:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1912/191179/191179_26.png哀求 发表于 2025-3-26 07:49:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1912/191179/191179_27.pngSTEER 发表于 2025-3-26 08:59:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1912/191179/191179_28.png鞠躬 发表于 2025-3-26 15:54:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1912/191179/191179_29.pngCORD 发表于 2025-3-26 20:08:32
Chevron and the Evolution of Human Energyactice, whether they convey any type of intellectual or institutional change, and what these changes could reveal of their broader environment. Second, this chapter proposes understanding the intellectual changes think tanks underwent—as well as their import in politics and policy—through their func