offense
发表于 2025-3-25 05:26:06
The Standard of Living Debate,es of this period, the hardest fought. Yet, on the surface, there seems to be no argument against the fact that the national income per capita doubled between 1791–1851. This would naturally lead us to assume that the standard of living of the mass of the people improved. However, one needs to know:
酷热
发表于 2025-3-25 08:20:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1912/191163/191163_22.png
星星
发表于 2025-3-25 14:12:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1912/191163/191163_23.png
savage
发表于 2025-3-25 17:42:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1912/191163/191163_24.png
hypnogram
发表于 2025-3-25 22:34:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1912/191163/191163_25.png
CHAR
发表于 2025-3-26 01:03:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1912/191163/191163_26.png
尊重
发表于 2025-3-26 05:09:08
Introduction,he response of government, of society in general, of particular groups within society and of individuals. Sometimes their reactions coincided, at others they varied and conflicted. The results of their interaction, for good or ill, determined the new socio-political shape of Britain in 1900.
Amorous
发表于 2025-3-26 09:58:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1912/191163/191163_28.png
袭击
发表于 2025-3-26 13:26:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1912/191163/191163_29.png
hereditary
发表于 2025-3-26 18:46:08
Laissez-Faire and State Intervention: Social Management,oviding the necessary stability for society to function as it always had done. This was the mantle handed down by the Augustan Age, one which had grown heavier through preceding eras. It was a mantle which fitted well with the political suit of clothes fashioned in the style of laissez-faire philosophy.