Taylor
发表于 2025-3-21 16:44:11
书目名称British Politics on the Eve of Reform影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0191135<br><br> <br><br>书目名称British Politics on the Eve of Reform影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0191135<br><br> <br><br>书目名称British Politics on the Eve of Reform网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0191135<br><br> <br><br>书目名称British Politics on the Eve of Reform网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0191135<br><br> <br><br>书目名称British Politics on the Eve of Reform被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0191135<br><br> <br><br>书目名称British Politics on the Eve of Reform被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0191135<br><br> <br><br>书目名称British Politics on the Eve of Reform年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0191135<br><br> <br><br>书目名称British Politics on the Eve of Reform年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0191135<br><br> <br><br>书目名称British Politics on the Eve of Reform读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0191135<br><br> <br><br>书目名称British Politics on the Eve of Reform读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0191135<br><br> <br><br>
两栖动物
发表于 2025-3-21 21:31:33
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46488-1he principal features of British politics at one specific point in the early nineteenth century. My thinking was that in the list of distinguished analyses of similar kinds — Holmes on the early eighteenth century, Namier on the 1760s, Gash on the 1830s and Hanham on the 1860s and 1870s — a gap exis
indemnify
发表于 2025-3-22 04:28:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1912/191135/191135_3.png
MEET
发表于 2025-3-22 06:41:11
Market Driven Political Advertisingof the American war, the necessity of there being a single minister to act as an intermediary between the Crown and its ministers and to chair cabinet meetings was gradually accepted. It was also thought appropriate for such a minister to be the First Lord of the Treasury in view of the Treasury bei
勤劳
发表于 2025-3-22 12:45:27
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77730-6y there were some politicians like Charles James Fox or his nephew, Lord Holland, who as late as 1806 argued in Parliament that the cabinet was unknown to the constitution and that the emergence of such conventions as collective cabinet responsibility were unconstitutional in so far as they restrict
要素
发表于 2025-3-22 15:52:30
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10491-7nterest in collectivism led to the publication of a number of studies, the most important of which for this period was Henry Parris’s .. However, since then, with the exception of the publication of some highly useful compendiums of office-holders, interest faded until the appearance in 1989 of John
burnish
发表于 2025-3-22 21:05:58
H. Schlussbetrachtung und Ausblick,tly that legislation has attracted systematic analysis and then mainly for the period before 1800. Our knowledge of the subject is therefore patchy although some general features do stand out. It has been established, for example, that a piecemeal process of reform in procedural matters began in the
反省
发表于 2025-3-23 00:51:03
Das Konzept des Market Driving,ver doubted that conflict between two opposing forces — government and opposition — has been the dynamo of parliamentary politics since 1688. The formalisation in the Commons in the 1730s of the tradition of government sitting on the right hand of the Speaker and the opposition to the left underline
不可知论
发表于 2025-3-23 01:46:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1912/191135/191135_9.png
medium
发表于 2025-3-23 06:23:23
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5560-5, social and cultural conditions that shaped them. The mental and material worlds of elite and popular politics, it is thought, were so different that the former only took note of the more extreme manifestations of the latter, such as those expressed in the 1790s and the immediate postwar years; and