anniversary 发表于 2025-3-23 11:40:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1911/191070/191070_11.pngInjunction 发表于 2025-3-23 14:59:32
A. B. Leonard (Associate Director) knew that they were neither representative nor represented. How much and in what manner the chapbooks spoke to them forms the burden of speculation in this chapter. These uncertainties brush against a raw nerve of literary history: . has been the question plaguing historians of reading and of the b表示向前 发表于 2025-3-23 20:42:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1911/191070/191070_13.pngCanopy 发表于 2025-3-23 22:30:52
,Cadiz 1780–1808: A Corporate Experiment,ly, demotic broadsides against Napoleon sparked by 1803 fears of invasion reproduce the typological extremes of Gothic villain and hero. Philosophically, Gothic ideas and ideals shape up later in the period as Christian Socialism, the radical romantics of Carlyle and Ruskin, and the muscular Christi勋章 发表于 2025-3-24 03:57:11
Radcliffe, Revolution, and the Romance of Heroism, 1789–94lings of the characters. Then we find the ‘chequer-work of human life.’. Yet Radcliffe’s character studies, particularly as character traits bear on definitions of heroism, display far more chiaroscuro than they do high relief. In all his trials, Edmund remains a paragon. Long before they are tried, Radcliffe’s heroes seem fallible, if chivalric.肮脏 发表于 2025-3-24 09:48:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1911/191070/191070_16.pngPalter 发表于 2025-3-24 10:59:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1911/191070/191070_17.png临时抱佛脚 发表于 2025-3-24 16:36:10
A. B. Leonard (Associate Director)n this chapter. These uncertainties brush against a raw nerve of literary history: . has been the question plaguing historians of reading and of the book. This question has two axes. First, it requires knowledge of the content of the chapbooks. Second, it depends upon some information concerning the actual makeup of the audience.debacle 发表于 2025-3-24 21:05:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1911/191070/191070_19.pngFOVEA 发表于 2025-3-25 03:04:18
No Child’s Play: the Gothic Chapbooksn this chapter. These uncertainties brush against a raw nerve of literary history: . has been the question plaguing historians of reading and of the book. This question has two axes. First, it requires knowledge of the content of the chapbooks. Second, it depends upon some information concerning the actual makeup of the audience.