伤心 发表于 2025-3-25 03:31:29
The Press, the fascist ideologies, movements and regimes in Europe. The first publication is the ., one of the best-selling Catholic papers, which had a large amount of political and social commentary and a cross-class readership. While the . rivalled the . in sales, its focus was more on religious than politPATRI 发表于 2025-3-25 09:32:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1911/191012/191012_22.pngGREG 发表于 2025-3-25 14:41:52
Campbell, Dawson, Burns and Wall: Catholic Writers and the Crisis of Liberalism,ere part of it, in other ways they defined themselves as outsiders. The modernist poet Roy Campbell was aesthetically very different from the Chesterbelloc, but he rejected just as fiercely the compromises of English liberal culture. Lots of what Campbell wrote was driven by the need to dissociate h呼吸 发表于 2025-3-25 18:46:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1911/191012/191012_24.pngagonist 发表于 2025-3-25 23:36:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1911/191012/191012_25.pngCRUDE 发表于 2025-3-26 02:17:41
Catholic Anti-Fascism,re. There were also, however, distinctively Catholic anti-fascist voices in Britain. The Italian exile Don Luigi Sturzo, for example, eventually found a niche among a number of liberal Catholics. Periodicals such as . and the ., presented an alternative to the positive views of Mussolini and Franco镀金 发表于 2025-3-26 06:13:05
Conclusion, of liberal culture. Many Catholics were not fascists, but believed fascists to be against the same things as they were. Like many Catholics, fascists stood against materialist communism and liberal capitalism. For many Catholic intellectuals with little direct experience of communism, however, theArmory 发表于 2025-3-26 09:35:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1911/191012/191012_28.pngCamouflage 发表于 2025-3-26 16:13:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1911/191012/191012_29.pngHARD 发表于 2025-3-26 17:22:03
The Catholic Literary Right,inaries such as Hilaire Belloc and T.S. Eliot. Despite their differences, all of these contributors could be situated on the right of the political spectrum. While the periodical was explicitly Tory, however, it belonged to the sphere of cultural rather than party politics.