起来了 发表于 2025-3-23 10:45:25
Richard Allmendinger,Joshua Knowles . (1948), or ., as the American edition was called. Out of deepest conviction and best of motives, Liddell Hart became one of the leaders of an unpopular public campaign on the German generals’ behalf.He argued relentlessly that they were no more than honourable and patriotic professional soldiersInclement 发表于 2025-3-23 16:11:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1911/191003/191003_12.pngLAST 发表于 2025-3-23 21:24:28
,Liddell Hart’s Theory of Armoured Warfare,n the long run withstand critical scrutiny and only cast doubt on everything he wrote about himself. Nonetheless, a further examination of the evidence reveals that the main charges levelled against him are misplaced and based on almost incredible historiographical slips on the part of his chief criintellect 发表于 2025-3-24 00:46:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1911/191003/191003_14.pngidiopathic 发表于 2025-3-24 05:21:04
Conclusion, small offensive element of infantry was needed to support the tanks. This, however, was much less significant than he would later make it to be, for all the armour enthusiasts agreed that the armoured formation had to be tank-heavy, with only Lindsay on the record for proposing a more balanced team爆炸 发表于 2025-3-24 08:22:04
British Armour Theory and the Rise of the Panzer ArmRevising the Revisiojet-lag 发表于 2025-3-24 14:11:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1911/191003/191003_17.png似少年 发表于 2025-3-24 16:00:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1911/191003/191003_18.png连锁,连串 发表于 2025-3-24 20:52:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1911/191003/191003_19.pngLocale 发表于 2025-3-25 00:07:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1911/191003/191003_20.png