VEIL
发表于 2025-3-23 11:55:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1910/190959/190959_11.png
Jejune
发表于 2025-3-23 17:24:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1910/190959/190959_12.png
欢乐东方
发表于 2025-3-23 18:56:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1910/190959/190959_13.png
avenge
发表于 2025-3-23 23:28:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1910/190959/190959_14.png
津贴
发表于 2025-3-24 02:44:54
,The Commonwealth in British European Policy: Politics and Sentiment, 1956–63,rnment’s steady retreat from guarantees for Commonwealth interests in negotiations with other Europeans became increasingly evident. Those historians of the British decision to join the European Community who have tried to provide explanations for this discrepancy can roughly be divided into two ten
CODE
发表于 2025-3-24 06:31:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/20/1910/190959/190959_16.png
内向者
发表于 2025-3-24 13:31:05
,The Labour Government, Commonwealth Policy, and the Second Application to Join the EEC, 1964–67,c Community in the 1960s, it is both useful and appropriate to employ lines of analysis similar to those of contemporaries themselves. Above all, their understanding of Commonwealth policy and of the EEC’s impact upon it derived from comparison with Britain’s first application under Macmillan. Decis
就职
发表于 2025-3-24 17:07:38
A Matter of Preference: the EEC and the Erosion of the Old Commonwealth Relationship,lth, are usually treated as two quite distinct and separate fields of historical enquiry. It is as though the division of responsibilities in Whitehall in the 1950s and 1960s has marked out the territories of imperial historians and European integration specialists respectively. This has been unfort
aggrieve
发表于 2025-3-24 19:27:30
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523906European policy; foreign policy; government; Policy; trade; european union politics; British Politics
丰富
发表于 2025-3-24 23:46:12
Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2001