FEAT
发表于 2025-3-26 21:16:37
Grundlagen und Entwicklung der LogistikIn this talk. I shall take the liberty to confine myself to purely subjective ideas. In keeping with the spirit of the Symposium, I will not enter into technical details of any kind. By the same token, and so as to avoid the impression that I attempted a comprehensive learned survey of the field, I shall refrain from quoting any references.
种子
发表于 2025-3-27 03:44:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1900/189918/189918_32.png
宽度
发表于 2025-3-27 08:26:12
,Comments on ‘Causality Requirements and the Theory of Relativity’,Perhaps the most important point made in Havas’ paper is his emphasis on the need for theoretical physics to come to terms with the full implications of the theory of relativity; and, indeed, to achieve a much better understanding of just what those implications are.
慷慨援助
发表于 2025-3-27 09:33:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1900/189918/189918_34.png
opalescence
发表于 2025-3-27 13:37:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1900/189918/189918_35.png
Ventilator
发表于 2025-3-27 21:09:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1900/189918/189918_36.png
使坚硬
发表于 2025-3-28 00:03:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1900/189918/189918_37.png
acheon
发表于 2025-3-28 03:32:32
Causality Requirements and the Theory of Relativity,sense, we shall be concerned here with three theories of relativity, the one associated with Newtonian physics, and Einstein’s special and general theory. The groups to be considered are those associated with transformations of the space-time coordinates, and thus the physics underlying them is that
TEM
发表于 2025-3-28 09:44:08
Matter, Space and Logic,rn persistent over the entire length in which the levels tend to group themselves into three levels of increasing abstraction: theories of matter and mechanics, theories of space and geometry, and theories of logic. Running along the woof is a second pattern, a sequence of discovery pursued first at
Angioplasty
发表于 2025-3-28 10:57:38
Is Logic Empirical?,then want to raise the question: could some of the ‘necessary truths’ of logic ever turn out to be false .? I shall argue that the answer to this question is in the affirmative, and that logic is, in a certain sense, a natural science.