招惹 发表于 2025-3-26 22:21:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1899/189826/189826_31.pngfinite 发表于 2025-3-27 03:36:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1899/189826/189826_32.pngbrassy 发表于 2025-3-27 07:21:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1899/189826/189826_33.png保留 发表于 2025-3-27 09:58:38
Lecture Notes in Computer Science normative paradigm of the fixed borderline. As Perkins and Rumford explain, ‘bordering-as-process, coupled with a general interest in a range of mobilities, has led to the recognition that borders can be mobile to the same extent as those who seek to cross them’ (Perkins & Rumford, 2013, p. 268). WRecess 发表于 2025-3-27 16:57:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1899/189826/189826_35.pngSTENT 发表于 2025-3-27 19:55:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1899/189826/189826_36.png占卜者 发表于 2025-3-27 23:41:07
Anne-Laure Amilhat Szary (Professor of Political GHypopnea 发表于 2025-3-28 03:38:58
Borderities and the Politics of Contemporary Mobile Borders978-1-137-46885-7magnate 发表于 2025-3-28 08:06:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1899/189826/189826_39.png字谜游戏 发表于 2025-3-28 11:28:32
Bordering Capabilities versus Borders: Implications for National Bordershic borders. Today, it is becoming evident that even as national territories remain bounded by traditional geographic borderlines, globalization is causing novel types of ‘borderings’ to multiply; these borderings range from regimes protecting firms’ trading rights (even when incompatible with domes