Substitution 发表于 2025-3-25 03:49:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1898/189743/189743_21.pngClinch 发表于 2025-3-25 07:38:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-112-7e in the world. Yet, this chapter shows that in ., a new exposition of the Sermon on the Mount emerges, now arguing that the Christian disciple is called to responsible action that may include political action on behalf of one’s neighbour.mucous-membrane 发表于 2025-3-25 12:46:39
Francesco Bianconi,Antonio Fernándezlaws that enable discernment of right action. There emerges a tension between the agent who breaks the law in order to affirm the law but has no basis for doing so that is understandable within the context of the law.Traumatic-Grief 发表于 2025-3-25 19:40:55
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39289-4 political and social implications of Schmitt’s account of exception, in particular the danger of dictatorship, the loss of a democratic and shared world and the introduction of a force or violence without boundaries.身体萌芽 发表于 2025-3-25 20:57:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1898/189743/189743_25.pngconference 发表于 2025-3-26 00:25:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1898/189743/189743_26.pngfoppish 发表于 2025-3-26 08:19:42
Studies in Computational Intelligenceception. It suggests that Bonhoeffer’s concept of the ‘extraordinary’ potentially radicalises Schmitt’s concept of ‘exception’ as it extends to each disciple or follower of Christ, thereby potentially authorising each follower of Christ to enact violence in a ‘last resort’ scenario.天赋 发表于 2025-3-26 09:23:42
Loris Nanni,Michelangelo Paci,Stefano Severi an image emerges of the isolated disciple who acts in obedience to a higher command. This leads to a narrative in which following Jesus is understood in terms of conflict, struggle and opposition to the world. The ethical implications of this are shown via an examination of the young Bonhoeffer’s 1929 Barcelona lecture.陪审团 发表于 2025-3-26 12:57:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1898/189743/189743_29.png有法律效应 发表于 2025-3-26 17:20:40
,1946–1975: Churches at the Margin,ic, and Bonhoeffer’s place in this. By situating Bonhoeffer in the context of his peers, this chapter seeks to illuminate the ‘crisis’ thinking that pervaded the interwar years, and influenced Bonhoeffer’s own theology, and highlights the danger of too readily invoking crisis language.