amyloid 发表于 2025-3-28 17:58:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1889/188898/188898_41.pngengrossed 发表于 2025-3-28 22:16:09
Bitcoin and Mobile Payments978-1-137-57512-8Series ISSN 2662-5083 Series E-ISSN 2662-5091BOOR 发表于 2025-3-28 22:54:12
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-99294-0 treated as regular money, at least for purposes of VAT. The author addresses the implications of this decision and considers which VAT related questions are still left outstanding for Bitcoin. He concludes with some remarks about the VAT aspects of m-payments.神圣在玷污 发表于 2025-3-29 06:14:19
Palgrave Studies in Financial Services Technologyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/188898.jpg种子 发表于 2025-3-29 10:26:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1889/188898/188898_45.pngBallad 发表于 2025-3-29 13:30:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1889/188898/188898_46.png彩色的蜡笔 发表于 2025-3-29 19:06:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1889/188898/188898_47.pngSENT 发表于 2025-3-29 22:55:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1889/188898/188898_48.png忍受 发表于 2025-3-30 01:56:41
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-29956-2d univocally frame this phenomenon. Nonetheless, the US legal theory is presently debating how to include Bitcoins into pre-existing “regulatory folders”, while the country’s judiciary is dealing with the first cases pertaining to Bitcoins. The reaction of the US legal system to this radical technolcoagulate 发表于 2025-3-30 05:08:19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-29956-2atory restrictions and/or regulatory uncertainty which govern m-payments and which are the most formidable barriers to expanding m-payments to the mass market. It focuses on the pioneering—mostly unregulated—model M-Pesa in Kenya, on one side, and on the US legal and regulatory framework, on the oth