alabaster
发表于 2025-3-30 10:39:10
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53096-9r the limits to the access to funds. In this paper are examined, in a comparative perspective, some recent cases from Italian legislation and jurisprudence. It is also prospected a judicial protection of the collective interest in the “free scientific research.”
Bereavement
发表于 2025-3-30 13:43:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1887/188639/188639_52.png
割公牛膨胀
发表于 2025-3-30 20:33:41
Introductional applications, but also the protection of individual rights. It entails factual consequences that may potentially result in the violation of rights, and imposes the necessity of striking a balance between opposing interests.
情节剧
发表于 2025-3-30 23:54:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1887/188639/188639_54.png
是贪求
发表于 2025-3-31 03:23:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1887/188639/188639_55.png
充满人
发表于 2025-3-31 07:41:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1887/188639/188639_56.png
epicardium
发表于 2025-3-31 09:59:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1887/188639/188639_57.png
overshadow
发表于 2025-3-31 16:16:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1887/188639/188639_58.png
释放
发表于 2025-3-31 20:37:43
The Case against the Privatization of Knowledge: Some Thoughts on the Myriad Genetics Controversythe ‘old’ and ‘new’ enclosures. In this paper I suggest that the critical account of the rise of the ‘market economy’ provided by Polanyi can shed some light on other important issues in intellectual property law. In particular, I advance the hypothesis that the paradigm of the ‘double movement’ mig
商品
发表于 2025-3-31 23:23:22
The Right to Access the Benefits of Science and Intellectual Property Rightsncy in the wake of the extension of intellectual property rights to foundational fields of knowledge in the life-sciences. An enduring puzzle is the rationale for the juxtaposition of the right of individual inventors with the right of everyone to share in the benefits of science in Article 27 of th