nocturia 发表于 2025-3-23 11:27:14
,‘Post-Population’ or ‘Cultural’ Biopolitics? Rethinking Foucault’s Concepts Today, against Nikolas de others such as Colin Gordon (Burchill et al., 1991), is associated with the popularisation of Foucault’s thinking on governmentality and with the establishment of ‘governmentality studies’ as a sub-discipline of sociology, geography, political science and socio-legal studies — a sub-discipline fo厌倦吗你 发表于 2025-3-23 14:05:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1884/188389/188389_12.pngJejune 发表于 2025-3-23 18:47:38
Conclusion, of experience and of the plays of perception, affect, desire, and sense of reality that they make at home. This account does not reveal the ‘truth of an age’ or ‘a civilisation’, nor is it a total theory of modern politics or power. It is an attempt to capture the difference that is made to some po顽固 发表于 2025-3-23 23:40:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1884/188389/188389_14.pngmultiply 发表于 2025-3-24 04:22:14
,Escaping the Laws of Being: The Character of the ‘Bio’ in Foucault’s Genealogies of Biology and Bio-organic’, extending beyond the unity and self-persistence of individual organisms. As such ‘biopolitics’ (in Foucault) is not all and any politics that pertains to peoples’ physicality or health, it is specifically the politics of life, of man as a living ..凹室 发表于 2025-3-24 08:10:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1884/188389/188389_16.pngAcetaminophen 发表于 2025-3-24 12:42:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1884/188389/188389_17.pngFlawless 发表于 2025-3-24 16:30:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1884/188389/188389_18.pngTRUST 发表于 2025-3-24 19:00:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1884/188389/188389_19.png抛媚眼 发表于 2025-3-25 00:10:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1884/188389/188389_20.png