翻动
发表于 2025-3-23 12:27:06
History of Data Analysis in US Courts,impler, statistical and data analyses lay the foundations of current, and near future, Big Data litigation. Though the foundations are established, the use of Big Data in litigation requires some changes in analytic approaches.
集合
发表于 2025-3-23 15:49:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1857/185624/185624_12.png
匍匐
发表于 2025-3-23 21:42:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1857/185624/185624_13.png
conceal
发表于 2025-3-24 00:48:45
Soils as the Basis for Cultivated Ecosystemsed to data analyses in US courts and its implication for Big Data as related cases become more frequent in the courts. Significantly, technological changes that make Big Data possible threaten to change the basis of current statistical reasoning and the basis upon which courts make decisions.
以烟熏消毒
发表于 2025-3-24 03:46:46
Wastes or Resources in Agroecosystems? on third parties to meet their actual or perceived data needs. In these instances, a customer cannot test drive and check under the hood of a Big Data solution and is at the mercy of a software vendor’s product. This chapter illustrates the major issues with the use of Big Data.
不理会
发表于 2025-3-24 08:58:39
Global Climate Change and Agricultureng Big Data is starting to disrupt how evidence is considered and in fact what constitutes evidence in the court setting. Some areas that are going to be important as courts make that evolution are discussed in this chapter.
commensurate
发表于 2025-3-24 14:30:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1857/185624/185624_17.png
规范要多
发表于 2025-3-24 17:24:14
History of Data Analysis in US Courts,iated analyses have evolved over time as have the legal decisions and precedents surrounding these types of analyses. These earlier, and necessarily simpler, statistical and data analyses lay the foundations of current, and near future, Big Data litigation. Though the foundations are established, th
发牢骚
发表于 2025-3-24 20:56:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1857/185624/185624_19.png
轻率的你
发表于 2025-3-25 02:04:45
The Courts as Gatekeeper of Big Data Evidence,is standard, courts examined whether the proffered evidence had “gained general acceptance” in the particular field. In 1993, the Supreme Court decided ., and the court announced a new standard of admissibility for scientific evidence. This chapter illustrates how the Daubert standard has been appli