cathartic
发表于 2025-3-23 11:11:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1855/185424/185424_11.png
notion
发表于 2025-3-23 13:53:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1855/185424/185424_12.png
露天历史剧
发表于 2025-3-23 19:30:22
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1855/185424/185424_13.png
Astigmatism
发表于 2025-3-24 01:55:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1855/185424/185424_14.png
充满装饰
发表于 2025-3-24 05:45:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1855/185424/185424_15.png
的阐明
发表于 2025-3-24 09:20:33
Zusammenfassung Teil I: „Macht der Ringe“ytic philosophy of religion which mainly concentrates on the questions of epistemic justification or warrant. In the last section I deal with the question of biblical authority and the criteria of truth..
Observe
发表于 2025-3-24 10:52:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-59829-0pedient of taking the opposite view from that of the biblical texts as they stand - as well as reading those texts with a particularly keen eye for things that do not quite fit, or that suggest an argument with an absent opponent.
等级的上升
发表于 2025-3-24 16:33:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1855/185424/185424_18.png
acrimony
发表于 2025-3-24 21:22:35
Learning the Historical Trutha few matters that come up at times that I would quibble with, but Hannay’s basic criticism of Adams is correct. Also, Adams represents that which in principle has been rather widespread in the last half of the twentieth century on Søren Kierkegaard, so that Hannay’s careful engagement with Adams has important yield for wider discussion.
Rejuvenate
发表于 2025-3-25 01:50:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1855/185424/185424_20.png