BRINK
发表于 2025-3-23 10:54:09
Sibonakaliso S. Nhlabathi,Brij Maharaje judge and the legal professionals will be called on to balance and recognise. The capacity of the trial to identify and facilitate victim interests will therefore require a judge-directed collaborative approach committed to a truth-finding process that is balanced rather than confrontational. Henc
ATP861
发表于 2025-3-23 14:52:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1853/185258/185258_12.png
歌剧等
发表于 2025-3-23 19:03:54
New Moralities for International Criminal Justice,tified as crucial to making victim access a reality, and in developing the instrumental potential we see for trial justice and ICJ more generally, in changing the focus of accountability in global governance away from hegemony towards pluralism. However, we first turn to the task of explaining the m
Blemish
发表于 2025-3-23 23:35:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1853/185258/185258_14.png
Migratory
发表于 2025-3-24 03:05:13
Justice as Decision-Making: Principal Pathways of Influence,e judge and the legal professionals will be called on to balance and recognise. The capacity of the trial to identify and facilitate victim interests will therefore require a judge-directed collaborative approach committed to a truth-finding process that is balanced rather than confrontational. Henc
BRINK
发表于 2025-3-24 09:02:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1853/185258/185258_16.png
FRONT
发表于 2025-3-24 13:28:56
Beyond Punishment: Achieving International Criminal Justice
引起
发表于 2025-3-24 17:24:52
Beyond Punishment: Achieving International Criminal Justice978-0-230-25056-7
甜食
发表于 2025-3-24 20:06:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1853/185258/185258_19.png
RUPT
发表于 2025-3-25 02:28:30
Jean Murray,Anja Swennen,Clare KosnikThere is no pure adversarial or inquisitorial trial. Contemporary trial traditions either exhibit derivations of either paradigm or are hybrids incorporating essential influences from one and both traditions. Nevertheless, the adversarial and inquisitorial models exercise a strong influence over the nature of evidence and the standing of ‘fact’.