cortex
发表于 2025-3-25 04:23:55
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403938404 among others, the subject of a finite sentence is generated within VP and is raised to the IP Spec position at S-structure to have its Case checked. Fukui and Speas (1986), Abney (1986), and Kuroda (1988) propose a parallel analysis for the subject of NP: it is generated within NP and is moved to D
THROB
发表于 2025-3-25 10:44:17
International Relations After 1989,French, are said to allow “free inversion” of the subject. This view is based on the fact that “subject post-posing” in French is only possible in the presence of a triggering element, namely an operator in Comp (a wh-word or its trace) or a subjunctive mood (which might also be analyzed as an opera
贫困
发表于 2025-3-25 15:12:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1853/185255/185255_23.png
RODE
发表于 2025-3-25 19:10:17
978-0-7923-5501-4Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999
骇人
发表于 2025-3-25 22:45:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1853/185255/185255_25.png
不公开
发表于 2025-3-26 03:53:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1853/185255/185255_26.png
易达到
发表于 2025-3-26 06:20:26
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57202-8eve the major tasks which its proponents claim it to achieve. I will conclude that while the operation of N-to-D cannot be directly excluded, based on word order, there is no direct evidence for its existence and the word order phenomena which such an account seeks to explain must be accounted for in some other way.
Obscure
发表于 2025-3-26 09:09:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1853/185255/185255_28.png
CUR
发表于 2025-3-26 13:45:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1853/185255/185255_29.png
尖叫
发表于 2025-3-26 19:36:04
Book 1999 as the 70‘s reached their close. The revolution that Chomsky had brought to linguistics had to this point engendered theories which remained within the grip of the philologists‘ construction-based vision. Their image of language as a catalogue of independent constructions served as the backdrop aga