支票 发表于 2025-3-21 18:46:35

书目名称Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant影响因子(影响力)<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0184861<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0184861<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant网络公开度<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0184861<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant网络公开度学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0184861<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant被引频次<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0184861<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant被引频次学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0184861<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant年度引用<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0184861<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant年度引用学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0184861<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant读者反馈<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0184861<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant读者反馈学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0184861<br><br>        <br><br>

indicate 发表于 2025-3-21 23:28:18

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85642-9all structure of the Glasgow natural philosophy course that continued through Kelvin’s early professorship. Robison, it has been argued, defined a particularly Scottish approach to natural philosophy that influenced Meikleham and later Kelvin and Maxwell. The most direct path from Newton to Kelvin and Maxwell passed through Enlightenment Scotland.

Antimicrobial 发表于 2025-3-22 01:15:53

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1849/184861/184861_3.png

忙碌 发表于 2025-3-22 06:37:44

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1849/184861/184861_4.png

抛媚眼 发表于 2025-3-22 10:07:27

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1849/184861/184861_5.png

潜移默化 发表于 2025-3-22 16:22:23

The Limits of Intelligibility: The Status of Physical Science in D’Alembert’s Philosophyse . appeared in 1736), comes the time for theoretical reorganisation, for systematic presentation. But it is also time for new inquiries, into celestial perturbations, fluid phenomena, mechanical systems.

使饥饿 发表于 2025-3-22 18:52:27

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1849/184861/184861_7.png

联想 发表于 2025-3-22 21:37:35

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1849/184861/184861_8.png

instill 发表于 2025-3-23 04:44:21

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1849/184861/184861_9.png

creatine-kinase 发表于 2025-3-23 07:52:02

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48954-3atory principles are still part of present thinking in biology is shown by the frequency with which eighteenth-century naturalists are invoked as forerunners of modern convictions or as original sources of combatted doctrines in today’s controversies on various topics of biological systematics..
页: [1] 2 3 4 5
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Between Leibniz, Newton, and Kant; Philosophy and Scien Wolfgang Lefèvre Book 20011st edition Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 200