加花粗鄙人 发表于 2025-3-23 12:40:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1849/184851/184851_11.png防止 发表于 2025-3-23 15:57:33
Revolutions in Science: The Accumulation of Knowledge and the Correspondence of Theories, us to distinguish between various types of transformations which occur in the process of the evolution of knowledge and at the same time it indicates which types of transformations cannot be accounted for exclusively in logical terms.ECG769 发表于 2025-3-23 20:48:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1849/184851/184851_13.pngUncultured 发表于 2025-3-24 01:57:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1849/184851/184851_14.png投票 发表于 2025-3-24 03:23:54
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39777-6t is, the problem of how the transition from old to new ideas occurs, and what is the essence of this process. In the case of the development of scientific knowledge, this problem concerns the replacement of old theories by new ones. Attempts to solve this problem belong to the traditional tasks ofMonolithic 发表于 2025-3-24 08:17:31
Panuganti Sai Sri Vaishnav,Bhupinder Singhof relation between facts and theories is correct. The Popperian point of view in this matter is, as we have noticed, a variant of conventionalism. Despite a number of interesting details in Popper’s proposals, his solution of this problem is not at all surprising: the criticism of the concept of ‘b肥料 发表于 2025-3-24 12:00:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1849/184851/184851_17.png空中 发表于 2025-3-24 18:01:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39777-6 we cannot, then, accept the thesis that semantic correspondence remains preserved through all changes in the content of knowledge. Certain authors who accept this conclusion speak of the incommensurability of successive theories and treat such changes in the content of knowledge as the specific fea盘旋 发表于 2025-3-24 21:30:05
Between Experience and Metaphysics978-94-010-1797-8Series ISSN 0068-0346 Series E-ISSN 2214-7942空中 发表于 2025-3-25 01:03:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1849/184851/184851_20.png