允许
发表于 2025-3-30 11:30:46
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30855-0ng their particular interests is an accepted form of behaviour. This chapter argues, however, that national governments are in fact seriously constrained by the current legal framework governing EU external action, in particular its regime for imposing economic sanctions on third countries or indivi
glacial
发表于 2025-3-30 13:43:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1849/184838/184838_52.png
芳香一点
发表于 2025-3-30 19:36:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1849/184838/184838_53.png
LAITY
发表于 2025-3-30 22:07:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1849/184838/184838_54.png
constitutional
发表于 2025-3-31 03:01:32
In Search of Limits for the Protection of National Identities as a Member State Interest,dy in the context of the EEC Treaty, Member States were precluded from adopting measures that would obstruct the internal market unless they could invoke very good reasons permitted by the Treaty or the case law of the Court of Justice. Seeing the purpose of the founding Treaties, namely taming nati
镇压
发表于 2025-3-31 06:30:19
,EU Loyalty and the Protection of Member States’ National Interests,interplay with the principle of sincere cooperation. Enshrined in EU primary law, in particular in Article 4(3) TEU, that principle has evolved during the time into a veritable cornerstone of the EU legal order. Even though scholars have recently (re)started to pay attention to the loyalty principle
Affluence
发表于 2025-3-31 11:51:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1849/184838/184838_57.png
negligence
发表于 2025-3-31 14:37:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1849/184838/184838_58.png
pantomime
发表于 2025-3-31 20:06:14
Member State Interests in EU State Aid Law and Policy,e the interaction between national industrial policy preferences and the policies that EU State aid law allows Member States to pursue through State intervention. In doing so, it seeks to address the following key questions: to what extent are national preferences subsumed in the notion of “common i