一起
发表于 2025-3-23 12:23:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1839/183872/183872_11.png
blithe
发表于 2025-3-23 17:17:29
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11409-5systematically ordered. In particular, this was true of complex analysis, whose evolution up to Riemann’s time we are about to describe. If our account is to be reasonably systematic, then we cannot fully adhere to the chronological development: some things that came into being prior to the firm est
Gustatory
发表于 2025-3-23 20:12:36
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-10649-4in one chapter. Riemann discussed their mutual relations in his habilitation lecture “Über die Hypothesen die der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen” (“On the hypotheses which lie at the foundation of geometry”) (W. 272–287), presented in the summer of 1854.
积习已深
发表于 2025-3-23 22:32:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1839/183872/183872_14.png
倔强一点
发表于 2025-3-24 04:02:55
Geometry; Physics; Philosophy,in one chapter. Riemann discussed their mutual relations in his habilitation lecture “Über die Hypothesen die der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen” (“On the hypotheses which lie at the foundation of geometry”) (W. 272–287), presented in the summer of 1854.
Statins
发表于 2025-3-24 07:31:51
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-8176-4777-3Calculation; Finite; History of Mathematics; calculus; complex analysis; function; geometry; interpret; math
山崩
发表于 2025-3-24 14:18:12
978-0-8176-4776-6Springer Science+Business Media New York 1999
粗野
发表于 2025-3-24 15:54:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1839/183872/183872_18.png
轻快来事
发表于 2025-3-24 19:00:40
Real Analysis,Riemann’s habilitation paper . (W. 227–265) (.) was completed in 1853, but was published by Dedekind only in 1868. If we consider not just its topic but also its origin, contents, and influence, then we must assign the paper to the foundations of real analysis.
geometrician
发表于 2025-3-24 23:15:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1839/183872/183872_20.png