以烟熏消毒
发表于 2025-3-25 07:03:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1839/183860/183860_21.png
Finasteride
发表于 2025-3-25 11:04:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1839/183860/183860_22.png
RAGE
发表于 2025-3-25 14:12:54
978-3-031-44925-3The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
chisel
发表于 2025-3-25 16:01:48
Summation and Closing Thoughts,on of the main arguments offered throughout, while the latter touch on three relevant issues that warrant articulation—the justification of beliefs, the creative imagination, and the critical distinction between hearing and doing.
Obsessed
发表于 2025-3-25 20:08:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1839/183860/183860_25.png
宏伟
发表于 2025-3-26 04:05:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1839/183860/183860_26.png
先驱
发表于 2025-3-26 05:57:48
The Wisdom-Power Dialectic,extensively: the wisdom-power dialectic. The emphasis falls on the age-old conflict between the latter that has plagued humankind since scriveners began to record history. Put simply, wisdom without power is impotent to do the good, while power without wisdom is inimical to doing the good. Dark even
ALOFT
发表于 2025-3-26 10:36:49
The Ethics-Morality Dialectic,ds, ethics and morality, to designate the area of thought that probes the difference between permissible and impermissible conduct. Why is neither term on its own sufficient to define the subject matter under exploration? Why are both required? To answer this question, Shaw and Ricoeur invoke the co
heterodox
发表于 2025-3-26 12:57:03
The Ideology-Utopia Dialectic,d step of translating the ethics-morality dialectic into an institutional milieu. Why is the translation necessary? Because just as fish live in an aqueous domain, humans live in a political one. We mortals cannot escape this reality, so a governing structure must be in place to administer the moder
刚开始
发表于 2025-3-26 18:21:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1839/183860/183860_30.png