monochromatic
发表于 2025-3-23 11:22:38
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1359-9ously with social issues. What stood in their way was the threat of the Lord Chamberlain’s refusal of a license. Unsurprisingly, as James Woodfield states, a chief argument of those who supported the abolition of stage censorship was discrimination against serious dramatists. Like authors of music h
nullify
发表于 2025-3-23 13:54:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1839/183853/183853_12.png
制造
发表于 2025-3-23 21:40:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1839/183853/183853_13.png
ILEUM
发表于 2025-3-24 01:25:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1839/183853/183853_14.png
Headstrong
发表于 2025-3-24 02:54:41
Bernard Shaw and His Contemporarieshttp://image.papertrans.cn/b/image/183853.jpg
Fallibility
发表于 2025-3-24 06:44:07
Bernard Shaw and the Censors978-3-030-52186-8Series ISSN 2634-5811 Series E-ISSN 2634-582X
TERRA
发表于 2025-3-24 11:30:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1839/183853/183853_17.png
INTER
发表于 2025-3-24 16:45:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1839/183853/183853_18.png
Eclampsia
发表于 2025-3-24 20:30:58
The Erosion of Stage and Screen Censorship, in front of a moving bus. Not since Shaw, said Nicholas de Jongh, “had there been such an agitating dramatist and agent provocateur.” Osborne confronted the Lord Chamberlain’s vetoes “with determination and fury.” Like Shaw and others, he had to alter dialogue to obtain a license for his play to be
Ankylo-
发表于 2025-3-25 00:54:20
2634-5811 brity, not an outsider; as a classic, not one of the avant-garde, of which Victorians and Edwardians were intolerant; as ahead of his time, not of it, when he was called “disgusting,” “immoral", and "degenerate978-3-030-52188-2978-3-030-52186-8Series ISSN 2634-5811 Series E-ISSN 2634-582X