鉴赏家 发表于 2025-3-23 13:03:58

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1837/183675/183675_11.png

GROSS 发表于 2025-3-23 17:14:35

The Dynamic Continuity of Durationnd clearly separate entities which, precisely because of their distinctness and separability, may be treated in arithmetical fashion. This idea of distinct mental states was most clearly and explicitly formulated by the sensualistic associationism of the eighteenth century and its nineteenth and twe

receptors 发表于 2025-3-23 19:06:08

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1837/183675/183675_13.png

Exaggerate 发表于 2025-3-23 22:40:24

Superfluity of Succession in the Deterministic Schemesstic (or theological) determinism the future is . by the present or by any previous moment. Every logical implication is admittedly timeless. It is a commonplace in logic to distinguish between the implication itself which is beyond time — ‘tenseless’ as it is fashionable to say today — and the psyc

爱好 发表于 2025-3-24 04:04:02

The Leibniz-Fouillé Argument for the Compatibility of Succession and Determinismbiguity of the words “follows”, “antecedent”, and “consequent”, which were understood in both a temporal and logical sense. As long as he realized that temporal and logical sequence were two different things, he was satisfied to say that they were both . correlated; in other words, that the coexiste

POINT 发表于 2025-3-24 07:10:58

The Heterogeneity of Duration: Lovejoy-Ushenko’s Objectionssuccessive phases of any temporal process. It is precisely this difference which accounts for the element of indetermination and creativity which constitutes the essence of the present moment. In other words, true duration is by its own nature heterogeneous; homogeneous time is merely a practically

Solace 发表于 2025-3-24 12:26:03

The Deeper Meaning of the ‘Indivisible Heterogeneity’ Of Durationderstanding. As long as we understand, on the one hand, the terms “indivisibility” or “unity” in a rigid and static sense — we might say in an Eleatic sense — while, on the other hand, the term “heterogeneity” is made synonymous with “arithmetical multiplicity,” the contradiction is obvious and unav

合并 发表于 2025-3-24 16:16:33

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1837/183675/183675_18.png

abnegate 发表于 2025-3-24 19:12:39

978-94-010-3098-4D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1971

Blood-Clot 发表于 2025-3-25 02:52:47

http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1837/183675/183675_20.png
页: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Bergson and Modern Physics; A Reinterpretation a Milič Čapek Book 1971 D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1971 15th century.B