Glitch
发表于 2025-3-21 19:07:24
书目名称Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0183335<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0183335<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0183335<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0183335<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0183335<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0183335<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0183335<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0183335<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0183335<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Belly-Rippers, Surgical Innovation and the Ovariotomy Controversy读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0183335<br><br> <br><br>
nephritis
发表于 2025-3-21 20:30:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183335/183335_2.png
Axon895
发表于 2025-3-22 01:00:00
ury medicine and society.Provides a new analytical framework.This open access book looks at the dramatic history of ovariotomy, an operation to remove ovarian tumours first practiced in the early nineteenth century. Bold and daring, surgeons who performed it claimed to be initiating a new era of sur
Intercept
发表于 2025-3-22 07:14:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183335/183335_4.png
人造
发表于 2025-3-22 10:50:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183335/183335_5.png
cogitate
发表于 2025-3-22 13:51:05
Conclusion,ovation process can be treated as self-evident; and that which we might initially take for granted as being unambiguous about an innovation: its beginning, its ending, even its definition, are not necessarily so.
Culpable
发表于 2025-3-22 19:13:20
Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2018ability. This book traces the operation’s innovation, from its roots in eighteenth-century pathology, through the denouncement of those who performed it as ‘belly-rippers’, to its rapid uptake in the 1880s, when ovariotomists were accused of over-operating. Throughout the century, the operation was never a hair’s breadth from controversy..
高脚酒杯
发表于 2025-3-22 22:12:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183335/183335_8.png
细微差别
发表于 2025-3-23 02:45:16
On the Asymmetry of Economic Cyclesrade and business, which nonetheless was often gendered. The powerful financial connotations of ovariotomy were revealing not only of the ascendance of surgeons’ professional status (in which money played an implicit role) but also the pecuniary gains—and losses—that association with surgical innovation could bring.
羞辱
发表于 2025-3-23 07:20:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183335/183335_10.png