国家明智 发表于 2025-3-23 12:45:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183312/183312_11.pngLigament 发表于 2025-3-23 15:56:04
Knowing Where to Stop,oundations is explored in a variety of contexts. The nature of the difficulties and tempta tions varies and does not form a neat unity. Nevertheless, they all involve, in some way or other, a failure to stop when one should stop. We want to ask how we know that we are seeing a tree when we are direc连接 发表于 2025-3-23 20:20:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183312/183312_13.pngGROUP 发表于 2025-3-24 00:22:43
The Challenge of What We Know: The Problem of Evil,forgetfulness of the meaning of certain fundamental religious concepts. His task, it seemed, was simply to provide reminders of the meanings which had been forgotten. Here, however, certain further facts compli cated his task, facts to do with much philosophical and theological activity of his time.宣传 发表于 2025-3-24 04:06:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183312/183312_15.pngIndividual 发表于 2025-3-24 08:51:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183312/183312_16.png向前变椭圆 发表于 2025-3-24 14:36:00
Wittgenstein and Religion: Fashionable Criticisms,men tators. Unfortunately, it cannot be denied that a philosophy by innuendo has grown up by which it is hinted, rather than argued, that what Wittgenstein is said to have said about religion and ritual is not closely related to the rest of his work. It has been suggested also that those influenced松软 发表于 2025-3-24 18:26:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183312/183312_18.pngInfant 发表于 2025-3-24 21:22:35
The Challenge of What We Know: The Problem of Evil,fect the old concept of a promise, changing it substantively. If such influence were successful, one would have to conclude that this is what promising had now become. Before that stage is reached, people who remember the old concept of a promise will continue to protest that in saying what a promis横截,横断 发表于 2025-3-24 23:39:06
Can There Be a Christian Philosophy?,gious pictures, religious individualism, religious rationalism, and religious accommodation have to be aban doned. But what if the theological response refuses to countenance the cultural changes we mentioned? Is philosophy’s critical reaction to such a confusion a matter of trespassing on a domain