新奇 发表于 2025-3-28 17:50:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183309/183309_41.pngsubordinate 发表于 2025-3-28 22:25:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183309/183309_42.png伪造者 发表于 2025-3-29 02:52:00
Nils Diederich,Ingeborg Haag,Georg Cadele possibility of ethics. Here belief in the self – in my substance as an agent – seems to blind me to the reality of my agency and its consequences. Two examples may serve to illustrate some of the ways identity and ethics can easily come to work against each other喃喃而言 发表于 2025-3-29 07:05:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183309/183309_44.png爱社交 发表于 2025-3-29 10:52:35
Philosophy as Activity,lemented. There are no gods here; it is a radically secular tradition that we explore. But the argument is not atheist; belief and answers, convictions and crises simply are all defined in purely human terms. We deal here with human dilemmas, and with human intellectual and spiritual means.Jacket 发表于 2025-3-29 13:11:41
Agency without Agents,e possibility of ethics. Here belief in the self – in my substance as an agent – seems to blind me to the reality of my agency and its consequences. Two examples may serve to illustrate some of the ways identity and ethics can easily come to work against each other证明无罪 发表于 2025-3-29 16:11:28
Belief, Parrhesia and Practice,le to relate to self and other? Is understanding, belonging and/or unity possible, between me and you, self and other, consciousness and existence, humanity and cosmos? And if we are disjointed, separate and alienated, can we repair the damage, overcome the dilemma(s), and/or improve our state of being?Optometrist 发表于 2025-3-29 20:04:28
Wirtschaftsskizze der Industriere as a self-evident scientific truth. Said (1978) of course criticized as stereotypical many Western appropriations of Arab, Middle Eastern and Muslim cultures and Progler develops this theme by arguing thatpeak-flow 发表于 2025-3-30 02:48:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/19/1834/183309/183309_49.png高兴一回 发表于 2025-3-30 06:19:35
Organizing a Buddhist Way,. They also differ in whether they centre an individual inquirer or relational processes, in whether they present inquiry as if it were with or ‘without philosophy’ (Bentz and Shapiro, 1998) and in whether inquiry is presented as with or without cultural and historical embeddedness (Hosking, 2011).